6b7337fa-037b-4c03-a8be-fd4c5722fe1a
English
ISO/IEC 8859-1 (also known as Latin 1)
dataset
dataset
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre
Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg
Lancaster
LA1 4AP
UK
info@eidc.ac.uk
https://eidc.ac.uk/
EIDC website
The Environmental Information Data Centre (EIDC) is the UK's national data centre for terrestrial and freshwater sciences.
information
pointOfContact
2024-03-04T16:38:24
UK GEMINI
2.3
Diatom data from the South Fork McKenzie River in Oregon, USA after a wildfire event, 2021 to 2022
2023-01-17
publication
https://catalogue.ceh.ac.uk/id/6b7337fa-037b-4c03-a8be-fd4c5722fe1a
10.5285/6b7337fa-037b-4c03-a8be-fd4c5722fe1a
doi:
Colley, M., Dugdale, S.J., Edwards, P., Field, R., Flitcroft, R., Johnson, M., Mariani, M., Means-Brous, M., Mickelson, E., Pugh, B., Schrodt, F., Thorne, C. (2023). Diatom data from the South Fork McKenzie River in Oregon, USA after a wildfire event, 2021 to 2022. NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre 10.5285/6b7337fa-037b-4c03-a8be-fd4c5722fe1a
Periphyton data consists of diatom scrubs sampled in a range of riffle and pool habitats including diatom taxa counts (identified to genus level) and computed autotrophic index (ratio of the organic mass per cm2 to mass (microgram) of chlorophyll a) as well as site characterisation data. The data were collected from the South Fork McKenzie river, Oregon, USA in September of 2021 and February 2022 following the Holiday Farm wildfire in Autumn 2020. Samples were collected from a restored and unrestored reach of the South Fork McKenzie River with a view to quantifying differences in periphyton response to wildfire in the restored vs. unrestored river reaches. The study was conducted by the University of Nottingham, with data collected by partners from The US Forest Service, Portland State University, Washington State University and Colorado State University. Funding for the work was received from the Natural Environment Research Council. Full details about this dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5285/6b7337fa-037b-4c03-a8be-fd4c5722fe1a
Colley, M.
Portland State University
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Dugdale, S.J.
University of Nottingham
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Edwards, P.
Portland State University
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Field, R.
University of Nottingham
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Flitcroft, R.
US Forest Service
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Johnson, M.
University of Nottingham
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Mariani, M.
University of Nottingham
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Means-Brous, M.
Colorado State University
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Mickelson, E.
Portland State University
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Pugh, B.
University of Nottingham
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Schrodt, F.
University of Nottingham
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Thorne, C.
University of Nottingham
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
author
Dugdale, S.J.
University of Nottingham
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
pointOfContact
University of Nottingham
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
owner
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
custodian
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre
enquiries@ceh.ac.uk
publisher
otherRestrictions
Registration is required to access this data
otherRestrictions
This resource is available under the terms of the Open Government Licence
otherRestrictions
If you reuse this data, you should cite: Colley, M., Dugdale, S.J., Edwards, P., Field, R., Flitcroft, R., Johnson, M., Mariani, M., Means-Brous, M., Mickelson, E., Pugh, B., Schrodt, F., Thorne, C. (2023). Diatom data from the South Fork McKenzie River in Oregon, USA after a wildfire event, 2021 to 2022. NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre https://doi.org/10.5285/6b7337fa-037b-4c03-a8be-fd4c5722fe1a
textTable
English
utf8
biota
2021-01-01
2022-11-14
-122.29
-122.23
44.13
44.16
Comma-separated values (CSV)
NERC EDS Environmental Information Data Centre
info@eidc.ac.uk
distributor
https://data-package.ceh.ac.uk/data/6b7337fa-037b-4c03-a8be-fd4c5722fe1a
Download the data
Download a copy of this data
download
https://data-package.ceh.ac.uk/sd/6b7337fa-037b-4c03-a8be-fd4c5722fe1a.zip
Supporting information
Supporting information available to assist in re-use of this dataset
information
dataset
dataset
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services
2010-12-08
Periphyton was sampled in riffles and pools in the restored and unrestored reach of South Fork McKenzie River using standard methods (Baird, Eaton & Rice, 2017 ISBN: 9780875532875; Kelly et al., 1998 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008033201227). A toothbrush was used to scrub the periphyton off five randomly selected cobbles. The cobbles were rinsed with distilled water and the resultant liquid was composited them into a single sample, which was split into three subsamples. One subsample was preserved in 37% formalin for diatom composition analysis, while two unpreserved subsamples were analysed for chlorophyll a (Chl a) and ash-free dry mass (AFDM). At least 500 diatom valves were counted from each sample and identified to genus level.